Friday, 19 April 2013

Republics in Ancient India

Our country India is a fascinating country. In this piece I wish to refer to the overwhelming material to show that in many regions there were republics, that is, areas without kings, in ancient India.

This material consists of (1) The Mahabharata,(2) The Buddhist Canon,both in Sanskrit and in Pali, (3) The accounts of Greek and Roman historians regarding Alexander the Great's invasion of India in 326 B.C. (4) Panini's Ashtadhyayi, (5) Kautilya's Arthashastra, etc

Let us first take the Mahabharat. In Chapter 107/108 of Shantiparva there is a detailed narration by Bheeshma Pitaamah to Yudhishthir about the features of republics (called ganas) in India. Bheeshma states that when there is unity among the people of a republic that republic becomes powerful and its people become prosperous. Such people are intelligent, brave,enthusiastic, honest, and trained in the use of arms. They do not cheat each other, and help those in distress. This way they prosper.
Having said this Bheeshma then narrates how republics are destroyed :

" Bhedey ganaah vineyshur hi bhinnaastu sujayaah paraih
Tasmaat sanghaatyogen prayateran ganaah sadaa"

I.e. "Republics are destroyed only by internal conflicts between the people
Therefore republics should always seek to maintain good relations among the people"

and also :

"Teshaam ayonyabhinnaanaam swashaktim anutishthataam
Nigrahah panditaih kaaryah kshipramev pradhaanatah"

which means :

" Therefore the wise people in a republic should crush the chiefs of the wicked persons who try to divide the people"

This is a fascinating narrative in the Mahabharat. It shows that in ancient India there were not only kingdoms (like Hastinapur and Indraprastha) but also regions where there was no king but a republic. As to details about the organization and functioning of these republics the material available is vague and scanty, but that there were republics can not be doubted. As long as people of these republics were united they were strong and prosperous, but they became endangered when there were dissensions among the people.

The Buddhist Canon, both in Sanskrit (in which much of Mahayana Buddhist literature was written) and in Pali (in which much of Hinayana literature was written) has extensive reference to republics in India, e.g. the Lichchavi city of Vaishali. Thus in the Pali Buddhist work 'The Mahanibbana Sutra' it is mentioned that when King Ajaatshatru of Magadha was planning to attack the Vajjian democratic republic he sent a messenger to the Buddha for his opinion. Instead of speaking to this messenger, the Buddha said to one of his disciples :" Have you heard Anand that the Vajjians foregather often and frequent the public meetings of their clan ? So long Anand, as the Vajjians so foregather, and so frequent, the public meetings of their clan, so long they may be expected not to decline but to prosper".

Similarly, in the Avadaana Shatak, a Sanskrit Buddhist text of the second century A.D. it is mentioned that a group of merchants went from North India to the Deccan, and were asked by the King of the Deccan as to who was the king who ruled over North India. The merchants replied :
" Deva, kechit deshaah ganaadheenaah, kechit raajaadheenah, iti"
which means :
" Your Majesty, certain areas are under a republican form of government, while others are under kings"

Alexander the Great's invasion of India in 326 B.C. has provided a lot of material to show that there were many parts of India under republican forms of government, not kings. The Greek historian Diodorus Siculus writes that at the time of Alexander's invasion most cities in North West India had democratic forms of government (though some areas were under kings,e.g. Ambhi and Porus) and this is also mentioned by the historian Arian. Alexander's army faced its fiercest resistance from the armies of these republics,e.g. the Mallas, and gained victory only after suffering huge casualties.

Panini and Kautilya have also referred to these republics (ganas) in many parts of India.

I have referred to all this to show that if today's Indian Repulic and its people wish to be strong and prosperous they must be united, and not divided on the basis of religion, caste, language, region, race, etc as some wicked people are trying to do.


  1. good, sir we are still want to see your stand on Sc termed misuse of law as legal terrorism but neither media or govt is understand Misuse of Law = a serious crime = Legal Terrorism and need a storng deterant.

  2. Please mention not divide on the basis of Sex/gender also, the new political game started and impact will be far reaching.

  3. Awesome post. We truly need more like you in today's world.

  4. You are one of the outspoken persons in india.. So i request you to clear your stand on sri lankan tamils issue.. Hope you'd post something about this issue soon..

  5. Being bold is your strength..

  6. Does vasudeva kutubakom means we should also not have any counteries and the entire world must be united for progress...If only India is united and other countries fight with us will we prosper.

  7. Gana can also mean a tribe? That is in historical evolution always tribal communities and their so-called primitive justice of direct democracy, of course under a consensual chief, prevailed everywhere in the world. Were these Ganas remnants of that phase and not republics proper? However, if there is evidence that people of various tribes co-existed in the Ganas under a democratic setup, then they can be deemed as proto-republics.

    1. Katju is overly eager to keep this country united. Of course we all know why.:-) But he ends up contradicting himself....
      I believe that not only in ancient India but Republic and Ganas existed in medieval and British India also. It is the Indian Union that forcibly attached all such entities to make it a country. Over and above it imported some text from Europe and called it as constitution. And worst continue to IMPOSE unnatural equality in a naturally pluralistic society.

  8. Great article ...Thanks for your great information, the contents are quiet interesting.I will be waiting for your next post.

  9. Thanks so much for this. This is awesome post I ever seen on internet. This is rare to find that’s why difficult to understand. Anyway, you are definitely someone that has something to say that people need to hear. Keep up the good work.

  10. Excellent tips. Really useful stuff. Never had an idea about this will look for more of such informative posts from your side. Good job Keep it up.


  11. Nice staffing agency.I really like your dedication towards work.Thanks for the blog post

  12. This comment has been removed by the author.

  13. Raj Nagar Extension could be a territorial dominion consisting of moderately an oversized variety of stories and well equipped with elevators. It’s situated in Ghaziabad (NCR), placed on the freshly developed Meerut Bypass six lane highways NH-58.
    Raj Nagar Extension

  14. Well you can see plight of Kashmiri pandits and rapes of Pakistani Hindus, plight of hindus in muslim dominated areas of India (esp. UP and WB), atrocities of Bangladeshi Muslims on Hindus,killing of hindu leader in Tamil Nadu. Every action has an equal and opposite reaction.And we believe some middle east sponsored documentaries made to spread hate in Indian Muslims and we ignore the court's verdicts. In a nation surrounded by corruption and fake secularism we need a leader with development on its agenda.

  15. Knowledge giving and true. Thanks.